Review Mode Set 1 – AZ-104 Azure Administrator – Question 20

[Tyler L.]

With the way the options were displayed to me in the question, VM 5 would be created first, then VM4 (screenshot attached). However, the answer assumes that VM 4 was created first, so VM5 cannot be created (screenshot attached). This is confusing at best and makes the answers appear to be incorrect, however based on the order that I received the options in, my answers appear to be correct. I was asked about VM5 first, not VM4. I just wanted to make sure that there isn’t something that I am missing here. Thank you for your help.

[Irene-TutorialsDojo]

Hi Tyler L,

Thank you for reaching out and for sharing the screenshots! I completely understand the confusion caused by the shuffled order of the questions.

The scenario is based on the original order in which the virtual machines (VMs) are created. Accordingly, VM4 was intended to be created first, followed by VM5, and then VM6. However, since the answer choices were shuffled on your screen, it may have appeared that VM5 was created first, leading to a different interpretation of the constraints.

The key factor here is that the sequence of VM creation is determined by the original table rather than the order in which the answer options were presented in the question. This means that even if VM5 was listed first in your displayed options, the underlying logic still assumes that VM4 was created first, affecting resource availability for subsequent VMs.

I understand how this could be misleading, and I appreciate you flagging this. Your feedback is valuable, and I will share it with the team to ensure we improve clarity on how these types of questions will be presented in the future.

Please let me know if you have further questions—I’m happy to help!

Best,

Irene @ Tutorials Dojo