Reply To: NSG question

[samabc]

Hi JR, Thank you for this explanation but I still don’t understand.

I don’t think there is any question that TDNSG is not associated with TD1. I think the question really has to do with if it is associated with TD2.

Rule 300 specifically allows TCP traffic from TD1 to TD2 over any port – yet the image shows that traffic over port 443 from TD1 to TD2 is unreachable.

I would think that if rule 300 were being respected (by either machine, actually) that traffic would be allowed. But since that traffic is not allowed it makes me think that TDNSG1 is not being used.

> The unreachable status for TCP port 443 is likely due to TD1 not being configured to listen for incoming connections on that port.

If there are external factors influencing communication between the machines then the question about TDNSG would seem to be unanswerable.

Is it a true statement that if both machines are configured correctly to allow communication, and rule 300 is being respected by TD2, than TCP traffic should be allowed between TD1 and TD2?

• This reply was modified 6 months ago by  samabc.